QUOTE(LEGENDRAFI @ Jan 10 2006, 09:03 PM)
The 50 overs games are following the same patterns these days making things a lot more predictable and thus less fun. So, as much I like 20-20, I do think that ICC needs to address some serious issues with the new rules in the 50 over game so that the game can become more interesting. Specially the Super Sub being selected after the toss (at the moment it is a ridiculous gamble) and ofcourse the first 15 overs should have been left alone and the Power Play should have been added to the remeanining 35 overs. That would make things a lot more challenging and intriguing. What say you?
Some good points made LR ji. I agree with you on the above. I also beleive that if the bowling side takes too much time to complete their overs then the highest amount of runs scored in any over by the batting side should be awared to them besides getting to face all overs.
There also needs to be some regulation for captains who needlesley approach umpires to question their decisions. I am sorry to say but the match refree only acts if any player of the subcontinent is in question.
Correct me if i am wrong, it is disgusting to see that refrees like LLoyd, Chris Broad and Madhugale have shown inconsisitency when dealing with players. They are more at ease making harsh decisions against players from the subcontinent. I am speaking about the game of cricket in general and not the 20-20 stuff.
Crazy umpires like Dayl Hair had the audocity to nearly ruin of a cricketing legend, Murlai. Such umpires are a threat to the game and should be out.
I would like to see the second string sides from each country participate in a 20-20 world cup. Through this we could get some real talent for the 50 over game.