![]() |
![]() |
Priya |
![]()
Post
#1
|
![]() Dedicated Member ![]() Group: Away Posts: 14700 Joined: 24-October 03 From: Kerala, India Member No.: 25 ![]() |
Hi friends,
Was listening to the song lambi joru badi museebat--was the controversy on who sang this ever cleared--is it Lata or asha. VN bk says Asha. I believe Geet Kosh says lata. When u listen to the song it could be either of them. Any definitive info? Priya ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
SAJJAD |
![]()
Post
#2
|
![]() Dedicated Member ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2427 Joined: 22-October 03 From: MEMPHIS, TN U.S.A Member No.: 16 ![]() |
QUOTE(priya @ Feb 1 2005, 04:44 PM) Hi friends! This is strange!!! Sajjadbhai does not have a Rafi song????? ![]() I DON'T HAVE ALL THE RAFI SONGS ![]() Rafisaab sounds the same--the woman sounds more like Lata to me but the style is Ashaish though in 49 Lata too had not really developed her hallmark style. THIS IS REALLY STRANGE - PRIYA CAN'T TELL THE DIFFERENCE BTW LATA VS ASHA ![]() P If you get in bed with government, you should expect to walk funny the next day!!!!!!!!!!! |
unni |
![]()
Post
#3
|
![]() Dedicated Member ![]() Group: Away Posts: 8769 Joined: 20-March 04 From: Vaanar Nivas, Tribandar Marg, Bandarabad, MONKEYSTAN. Member No.: 356 ![]() |
QUOTE(SAJJAD @ Feb 1 2005, 10:31 AM) The real reason is that they sound the same in mp3PRO at 64 kbps! ![]() ![]() If you stop trying to make sense of it all, you'll be less confused. Reality is an illusion.
|
Priya |
![]()
Post
#4
|
![]() Dedicated Member ![]() Group: Away Posts: 14700 Joined: 24-October 03 From: Kerala, India Member No.: 25 ![]() |
QUOTE(unni @ Feb 1 2005, 09:07 PM) QUOTE(SAJJAD @ Feb 1 2005, 10:31 AM) The real reason is that they sound the same in mp3PRO at 64 kbps! ![]() ![]() Ha ha ha a pair of wise guys--Sajjadbhai and Unnijeeee--apne aap ko ruffians I mean Rafians kehte hain aur Rafisaab ka gaana nahi unke paas. BTW Unni the song that I have on my hard disc (which I will not ul for U) is at 192 kbs!!!!! (where is the thenga smilie?) Anyway am pretty sure it is Lata--here it is for U all at mp3pro 80 kbs ![]() ![]() |
sangeetbhakt |
![]()
Post
#5
|
Dedicated Member ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2090 Joined: 19-November 04 Member No.: 1288 ![]() |
QUOTE(priya @ Feb 1 2005, 10:42 AM) QUOTE(unni @ Feb 1 2005, 09:07 PM) QUOTE(SAJJAD @ Feb 1 2005, 10:31 AM) The real reason is that they sound the same in mp3PRO at 64 kbps! ![]() ![]() Ha ha ha a pair of wise guys--Sajjadbhai and Unnijeeee--apne aap ko ruffians I mean Rafians kehte hain aur Rafisaab ka gaana nahi unke paas. BTW Unni the song that I have on my hard disc (which I will not ul for U) is at 192 kbs!!!!! (where is the thenga smilie?) Anyway am pretty sure it is Lata--here it is for U all at mp3pro 80 kbs ![]() Actually I think it is Asha, a very very young Asha whose voice had still not deepened enough to distinguish it from Lata's thinner voice. The part that made me think it was Asha was right at the end of her first part where she says "o mai haar gayi" and there is a laTka in the voice which she used a lot with OPN later on. Again, it is hard to be 100% certain, but I shall be content believing it is Asha. After all, as a wise man often likes to quote: "reality is just an illusion". |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Disclaimer | HF Guidelines | ![]() |
Time is now: 21st July 2025 - 04:24 PM |