![]() |
![]() |
parag_sankla |
![]()
Post
#1
|
![]() Dedicated Member ![]() Group: Members Posts: 14260 Joined: 8-May 06 From: SFO Bay Area, US Member No.: 6005 ![]() |
I have not seen the film yet, but have read many reviews. My conclusion based on them is that the western world (British director - the same people who ruled us for over 150 years) has made an excellent piece of poverty porn out of India. The projection of Mumbai and India as a whole is slum (as if there are no homeless people in the developed countries). Using the word dog (even if some one defends that its a newly coined word = slum + underdog = slumdog) is derogatory.
Views most welcome. Jai Hind! Please visit www.geetadutt.com
|
![]() ![]() |
Marcilo |
![]()
Post
#2
|
![]() Dedicated Member ![]() Group: Members Posts: 7451 Joined: 1-March 04 From: USA Member No.: 309 ![]() |
QUOTE People might not support SDM as poverty porn but all over the net people are posting similar comments Everyone has right of opinion but saying movies that only show flashy buildings and hip culture of India, should be made, that is not right. Problem is if someone made movie which had all that, all these Ram sena guys will burn theater down. "too much of western culture"….. "not an Indian thingy" ... "Pubs are not in india culture"…."valentine day should never be celebrated",...so what is real Indian thingy? aab bechara Danny kare tau kayak are.. idher koovan .. udher khai..... - Just another gummy bear fan
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Disclaimer | HF Guidelines | ![]() |
Time is now: 28th July 2025 - 12:22 PM |