![]() |
![]() |
parag_sankla |
![]()
Post
#1
|
![]() Dedicated Member ![]() Group: Members Posts: 14260 Joined: 8-May 06 From: SFO Bay Area, US Member No.: 6005 ![]() |
I have not seen the film yet, but have read many reviews. My conclusion based on them is that the western world (British director - the same people who ruled us for over 150 years) has made an excellent piece of poverty porn out of India. The projection of Mumbai and India as a whole is slum (as if there are no homeless people in the developed countries). Using the word dog (even if some one defends that its a newly coined word = slum + underdog = slumdog) is derogatory.
Views most welcome. Jai Hind! Please visit www.geetadutt.com
|
![]() ![]() |
Marcilo |
![]()
Post
#2
|
![]() Dedicated Member ![]() Group: Members Posts: 7451 Joined: 1-March 04 From: USA Member No.: 309 ![]() |
QUOTE hi Parag bhai kuchh had tak aap theek keh rahe ho. Westerns hamesha kuchh hi topics ko touch karte hain jab India ki baat aati hai. Sonu, This is what you said... I do not agree at all with this. You can give 1000 + points or 1 million negative points, that's not the point of my debate. My point is on what basis have you made this statement? Do you have any data to quantify your claim? How many movies were made on slums, I asked you the count too? Have you taken into account making of "Gandhi" the movie when you made this statement? Have you read the link I gave you? Here it is again http://www.businessweek.com/globalbiz/cont...gn_id=rss_daily This post has been edited by Marcilo: Feb 27 2009, 08:31 PM - Just another gummy bear fan
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Disclaimer | HF Guidelines | ![]() |
Time is now: 28th July 2025 - 12:35 PM |