![]() |
![]() |
parag_sankla |
![]()
Post
#1
|
![]() Dedicated Member ![]() Group: Members Posts: 14260 Joined: 8-May 06 From: SFO Bay Area, US Member No.: 6005 ![]() |
I have not seen the film yet, but have read many reviews. My conclusion based on them is that the western world (British director - the same people who ruled us for over 150 years) has made an excellent piece of poverty porn out of India. The projection of Mumbai and India as a whole is slum (as if there are no homeless people in the developed countries). Using the word dog (even if some one defends that its a newly coined word = slum + underdog = slumdog) is derogatory.
Views most welcome. Jai Hind! Please visit www.geetadutt.com
|
![]() ![]() |
parag_sankla |
![]()
Post
#2
|
![]() Dedicated Member ![]() Group: Members Posts: 14260 Joined: 8-May 06 From: SFO Bay Area, US Member No.: 6005 ![]() |
There is no denial about existence of these issues, it is just that the film portrays only this side of India. That is exactly "Poverty Porn" IMHO.
Please visit www.geetadutt.com
|
Marcilo |
![]()
Post
#3
|
![]() Dedicated Member ![]() Group: Members Posts: 7451 Joined: 1-March 04 From: USA Member No.: 309 ![]() |
There is no denial about existence of these issues, it is just that the film portrays only this side of India. That is exactly "Poverty Porn" IMHO. I do not think we can ask independent film maker what movie to make. Else it will look like state propaganda. Also there are lots of processions against this. Well they can all pitch in money and make India shining part 2, that is how I feel - Just another gummy bear fan
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Disclaimer | HF Guidelines | ![]() |
Time is now: 28th July 2025 - 12:29 PM |