![]() |
![]() |
IDOL |
![]() ![]()
Post
#1
|
![]() Dedicated Member ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5434 Joined: 24-January 05 From: Calgary, Canada Member No.: 1583 ![]() |
Self Help For Depression Tips For Dealing With Depression 1.THINKING POSITIVE LY To Change Your Internal Dialogue You are your thoughts. Your perception of yourself and the world around you shapes the way you feel and how you relate to other people and events. And your perception of yourself and the world is shaped by your thoughts. Your thoughts affect whether you feel relaxed or worried, calm, stressed or depressed. In essence, your internal dialogue is VERY powerful and really can influence your health. "You don't have to control your thoughts; you just have to stop letting them control you." -- Dan Millman -- So THINKING POSITIVE LY is crucial in dealing with your health, CFS, FMS or depression... It's vital to your well-being that your inner thoughts are positive and healthy. Makes sense right? Well, now check out the following shocking fact… .......................................................................
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Nimii |
![]()
Post
#2
|
Dedicated Member ![]() Group: Members Posts: 22493 Joined: 20-October 03 Member No.: 3 ![]() |
Depression aided with no help to handle failures ends up fatal. Offlate many kids who have flunked exams have started taking extreme steps by ending their lives.
Wish there were more failure management Counsellors available in schools and colleges!!!!!!!!!!! Peer pressure, parents pressurizing the kids .. phew!! Education has become a burden than a illuminating a child's future. Sonu Delhi mein already 2 such cases ka report bhi aaya hai ![]() N ![]() |
IDOL |
![]()
Post
#3
|
![]() Dedicated Member ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5434 Joined: 24-January 05 From: Calgary, Canada Member No.: 1583 ![]() |
thank to all for likin this topic..................
ur right nimz................i guess big universities need well trained psycholgists to help students overcome obstacles .......................................................................
![]() |
IDOL |
![]()
Post
#4
|
![]() Dedicated Member ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5434 Joined: 24-January 05 From: Calgary, Canada Member No.: 1583 ![]() |
After you're over your depression, you'll still encounter occasional bad moods. Nonetheless, realising that bad moods aren't intolerable, and that you can do something about them may help prevent them from spiralling into a longer-lasting depression. Here are some tips for handling the blues and keeping upbeat.
Chomping on chocolate Various types of food reputedly affect moods. People probably turn to chocolate as frequently as they do any of the other mood-altering foods. A host of the substances found in chocolate have been cited as being responsible for its mood-lifting effects. However, some researchers believe that chocolate, like most especially palatable foods, alters mood primarily by causing a release of endorphins, the brain's opiates. If you find that chocolate works for you, indulge a little when a bad mood sets in. Warning If you're a chocoholic, and you feel pronounced guilt when you indulge in chocolate, this isn't the food for you when you feel low. Guilt will only deepen your funk. As with all things, moderation is the key. Doing something nice Doing something nice for someone else is one of the best ways you can extricate yourself from a bad mood. It helps you refocus your attention away from what put you in the bad mood and onto other people, in a positive way. And your improved mood is likely to last a lot longer than it will with other nice, quick fix pleasures like .......................................................................
![]() |
IDOL |
![]()
Post
#5
|
![]() Dedicated Member ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5434 Joined: 24-January 05 From: Calgary, Canada Member No.: 1583 ![]() |
MY NOTES: these will be notes based on my experience or study in books...........either u eliminate readin this part or should u wish, u can continue........it's gonna be like diary pages .......................................................................
![]() |
IDOL |
![]()
Post
#6
|
![]() Dedicated Member ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5434 Joined: 24-January 05 From: Calgary, Canada Member No.: 1583 ![]() |
My Notes:
Subject: Tone People use different tones while they are speaking. word means something litrary, but the tone might be an internal emotion for the time being. we , often, get hurt and get deceived with words. i write a shortstory to illusterate the point. -a boy and a girl are in luv.....due to circumstances, one goes to another country........at the time when girl used to say " i luv u" was passionate, pure and helpless.............four months later........the boy said i luv u..........sounded content, patient and compromising .................two years later, he says the same word, but tone is totally off...................it doesn't touch ur heart anymore........ OR:- -a nice and caring friend promises that whenever u need to go to shopping , he can give u a ride.....................after a while, he repeats the same word but with frusteration...........he seems to be chained with the word that he's not willing to achieve it anymore..........here comes the term TONE..........the tone that was required at the beginning was a spark of emotion.......and this makes huge difference in our lives people's sixth sense is stronger than the five ones..........caoz the sixth can hear,see,taste,touch, and can smell danger, changes, and problem from a very long distance.........like u can say, one smells danger Point: is that we need to perdict the situation before it happens and hurts..........it will save people from being betrayed, embarrassed, and hurt........it is like regular doctor check up.........check friend, love's tone everytime he/she makes the statement.......dun expect exact or more, and u will be safe........Good Luck! .......................................................................
![]() |
IDOL |
![]()
Post
#7
|
![]() Dedicated Member ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5434 Joined: 24-January 05 From: Calgary, Canada Member No.: 1583 ![]() |
My Notes:
Subject: Education some might agree that education is the biggest happiness in one's life. some people gets to know about value of education after teen life, but some knows right at the beginning. This topic is common. when ur little child in grade 3 or 4, u write pargraphs about "education" without understanding the meaning. It is all over the place, but an indepth study will reveal some new ideas that we hardly think about. if ur a rich family's son/daughter, ur forced to study. well, force might not be a good word, but ur education life is already schedualed. mom and dad have already decided about u, which is a blessing. But, those who are born in a poor family, their mom and dad have no time to think about education as they are busy to feed u. slowly, as u grow up, u learn that education is so important in life. u struggle for that while u can't afford it. u want to have it at any cost, but financial status does not help u to achive ur goal. here comes the disaster that some quit, but some keeps working hard and hits their goal. people believe what u struggle for has better taste than what u get as a granted. when a poor family's child gets his/her degree, that's the happiest moment of his/her life. however, it might be the same with rich child, but slightly different. rich child might cheer caoz he/she completed mom and dad's dream. poor child will cheer because he got what he was dreaming for. therefore, education is the biggest happiness in life in everyone's life. .......................................................................
![]() |
IDOL |
![]()
Post
#8
|
![]() Dedicated Member ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5434 Joined: 24-January 05 From: Calgary, Canada Member No.: 1583 ![]() |
What is evolutionary psychology? In the three and a half centuries since William Harvey proved that the purpose of the heart is to pump blood, physiologists have revealed the functional organization of the body in blinding detail. Their discoveries demonstrate beyond question that the structure of the body serves survival and reproduction. Further, there is near unanimity among biologists that this functional structure is a product of natural selection. In our century, psychologists have developed powerful techniques that conclusively demonstrate that cognition, too, has structure. Evolutionary psychologists are betting that cognitive structure, like physiological structure, has been designed by natural selection to serve survival and reproduction. Evolutionary psychology focuses on the evolved properties of nervous systems, especially those of humans. Because virtually all tissue in living organisms is functionally organized, and because this organization is the product of evolution by natural selection, a major presumption of evolutionary psychology is that the brain, too, is functionally organized, and best understood in evolutionary perspective. It is clear that the body is composed of a very large number of parts, and that each part is highly specialized to perform a specific function in service of the survival and reproduction of the organism. Using the body as a model for the brain, it is a fair guess that the brain, too, is composed of one or more functional parts, each of which is also specialized to facilitate the survival and reproduction of the organism (we'll get to genes in a bit). Thus, according to evolutionary psychology, neural tissue is no different from any other tissue: it is functionally organized to serve survival and reproduction. This is the foundational assumption of evolutionary psychology. Because vision, hearing, smell, pain, and motor control are indisputable functions of the nervous system that clearly have utility for survival and reproduction, this assumption has a high degree of face validity. Further, these examples suggests that the brain may best be conceived not as an organ with a single function, but rather as composed of a large, and potentially vast number of functional parts. Evolutionary biologists refer to the functional components of organisms as 'adaptations'. Evolutionary psychologists often refer to brain functions as psychological adaptations, although they are not qualitatively different from other adaptations. The functional organization of the body has been elucidated primarily by the direct examination of morphology. A detailed analysis of the structure and composition of our organs and tissues has resulted in an excellent understanding of their purpose. Unfortunately, this has not been the case with the brain. The gross morphology of the brain appears to have little connection with its functional properties. Although we have a fair understanding of nerve cells--the primary constituents of neural tissue--the properties of the brain clearly come from higher order assemblages of such cells, not just the cells themselves. This is just as true of organs like the heart as it is of the brain. Because nerve cells can rapidly change state (e.g., their firing rate), because such state-changes involve little energy, and because they can be well insulated from their neighbors, it is possible for a nerve cell to be in one state, whereas some of its close neighbors may be in completely different states. This is in marked contrast to, say, muscle cells. If one muscle cell is involved in a contraction, then nearby cells almost certainly are as well. Neural tissue is quite different. Even the individual states of nerve cells in a network depend critically on the topology of the network itself. Further, assemblages that are actually distinct may have a complex three-dimensional distribution that can be very difficult to untangle. These properties of neural tissue make it exceedingly difficult to "see" the morphology of neural assemblages--with few exceptions, the network topology of virtually our entire brain is currently "invisible." It exists at a scale above the individual cell, but well below that which can be teased apart with any imaging technology currently available. Until recent decades, much of our immune system was similarly "invisible." Evolutionary psychology offers one way around this technological limitation. If researchers had a sound basis for proposing brain functions a priori, they could then seek indirect evidence that brains in fact have these functional properties. Philosophers and scientists had long wondered why living things are made up of an amazing array of beautifully designed mechanisms, an organization which non-living things completely lack. Why is it that entities that reproduce manifest overwhelming evidence of design, but entities that don't reproduce are utterly devoid of the same? As Darwin and Wallace first perceived, the association of reproduction and design is not accidental. Evolution by natural selection is currently accepted as the only process whereby entities can acquire functional properties. Functional organization is the consequence of the reproductive feedback that characterizes natural selection. If a population of reproducing entities (hereafter organisms) varies in some trait, if the variations can be passed on to offspring, and if, as a consequence of possessing a particular variant, an organism produces more offspring on average than organisms that lack that variant over evolutionary time, then the population will come to consist solely of organisms possessing the reproductively efficacious variant trait. In this way, populations of organisms will tend to acquire traits that facilitate reproduction and lose traits that hinder reproduction. We now know that what is passed on to offspring is a large DNA molecule that is further partitioned into numerous sections called genes. Because the structure of this DNA is intimately bound up with the structure of the organism, variations in the DNA are strongly associated with variations in the organism. Changes in DNA are referred to as mutations, and result from environmental hazards such as radiation, toxins, etc. Reproduction is an enormously complex process. At any given moment in the human body, there are thousands of process that, should they fail to complete successfully, would result in death within minutes. For this reason, any given random change in the body is likely to hinder survival and reproduction, not facilitate it. There are far more ways for a mechanism to fail than there are ways to improve it. How many times has a change occurred to your car so that it got much higher than the EPA estimated miles-per-gallon rather than much lower? Thus, the vast majority of DNA mutations result in changes to the body (also called the phenotype) that hinder reproduction. Occasionally, however, a mutation occurs that results in a change to the phenotype that facilitates reproduction. Because this mutation can be passed on to offspring, and because this mutation tends to result in more offspring, the mutation becomes more frequent in the population. Over time, this process will result in organisms that have a sophisticated repertoire of mechanisms that facilitate reproduction We now have the answer to the question posed above: what functions is the brain likely to perform? If brain tissue is organized like all other tissue, it will perform precisely those functions that facilitate reproduction. More accurately, because evolution by natural selection is an historical process, and because the future cannot be predicted, the brain and body will perform functions that facilitated reproduction (note the past tense). Whether they currently do so will depend on how closely the present resembles the past. If we can develop an accurate picture of a species' reproductive ecology--the set of physical transformations that had to occur over evolutionary time for individuals to reproduce--we can infer those properties the organism is likely to have in order to ensure that those transformations reliably took place. Evolutionary time, the time it takes for reproductively efficacious mutations to arise and spread in the population, is often taken to be roughly 1000-10,000 generations; for humans, that equals about 20,000-200,000 years. Over the last 200,000 years, humans regularly encountered spiders and snakes, creatures whose toxins would have significantly impeded the reproduction of individuals unlucky enough to get injected with them. Over the last 100 years, humans have regularly encountered automobiles, encounters that also can seriously impede reproduction (e.g., by getting run over). Because 200,000 years is long enough for humans to evolve protective mechanisms, but 100 years isn't, we can predict that humans may well possess an innate aversion to spiders and snakes, but not to automobiles--even though far more people are currently killed by cars than by spiders or snakes. Once we have firmly established that avoiding spiders and snakes would have reliably facilitated the reproduction of ancestral humans, we can then design experiments to determine whether humans in fact possess an innate, cognitive ability to detect and avoid these animals (more on how to do this below). A major lesson of evolutionary psychology is that if you want to understand the brain, look deeply at the environment of our ancestors as focused through the lens of reproduction. If the presumptions of evolutionary psychology are correct, the structure of our brains should closely reflect our ancestral reproductive ecology. Thus, evolutionary psychology provides a method for perceiving the functional organization of the brain by studying the world--currently a far more tractable problem than disentangling neural assemblages. http://www.anth.ucsb.edu/projects/human/epfaq/ep.html .......................................................................
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Disclaimer | HF Guidelines | ![]() |
Time is now: 19th June 2025 - 05:07 PM |